OT Corner: Making Sense of Sensory Integration By Amy Wagenfeld, Ph.D, OTR/L Originally printed in October, 2005 My vision is to devote the next few columns talking about sensory integrative issues, such as what is sensory integration, terms generally tossed around in sensory integration theory, sensory integrative dysfunction (a more PC term than disorder), autism, learning disabilities, ADHD/ADD, and their potential links to sensory integration issues, some good information sites, and some practical ideas for things you can do at home with the kids. I do hope that throughout this ‘series’ you feel more comfortable with the whole idea of sensory integration theory, and more so in feeling that many things that you are doing right now, do in fact help support and nourish the sensory systems of your little ones. The late A. Jean Ayres (one of our most ‘prominent’ OTs) pioneered the field of sensory integration in the 1960’s. The roots of sensory integration therapy were grounded in neurology, psychology, physiology, and child development, to name just a few. Ayres was particularly interested in the way in which some children and adults seemed to demonstrate a great deal of trouble processing sensory information, demonstrated learning and attentional problems, and just seemed to have difficulty moving through life with ease. She devoted the rest of her professional career to sensory integration research. When you think of sensory integration, consider it as two separate words. Sensory or sensation refers to how we receive information without being aware of it, Integration is how we process and put things together, so combined, sensory integration refers to the “unconscious” ability to receive and process sensory cues from the environment. Sensory integration theory takes into account more than the sense of hearing and seeing, it also suggests that touch, movement, and body position in space have a significant impact on the way in which we interpret our environment. Now let’s talk about the specifics of sensory integration. I think that sensory integration is best explained in the words of Jean Ayres. She described sensory integration as “The organization of sensation for use.” It is through sensory integration and organization that the nervous system comes together or organizes itself so that a person can most effectively and satisfactorily experience the environment. Conversely, sensory integrative dysfunction refers to a disorganized nervous system. Someone experiencing a sensory integrative dysfunction would then have trouble negotiating his or her environment; just getting through the day might be very challenging and very frustrating. Now that we have talked about what sensory integration IS, let’s talk about who administers sensory integration therapy. First of all, qualified OTs and PTs carry out SI therapy. Here’s the tough part. In order to administer the only standardized evaluation (called the Sensory Integration Praxis Test- SIPT) of sensory integration, a therapist MUST have received specialized training and be certified to administer, interpret, and make diagnostic predictions based on results of the SIPT. But, an OT or PT who is not certified may certainly use sensory integration techniques in their therapy sessions. Whether you choose to pursue specialized treatment by a certified therapist is most definitely your preference, and in the Boston area we are fortunate to have in our midst some very qualified SI therapists. [Just a quick aside, and in case you are wondering, I am NOT certified to administer the SIPT, but have certainly worked with many children with sensory issues. I also did and do not hesitate to recommend specialized evaluation and treatment if I felt the situation is warranted.] It is not only perfectly reasonable, but your right to ask a therapist if he or she is certified to administer the SIPT, and if not, if he or she has taken courses or seminars on SI. I think this is definitely a case of, “the more you know” rules! Before I wind up for the month, I’d like to provide you with a working glossary of terms that are generally associated with sensory integration. Next month I will go into much greater detail about each of these terms, and more so how dysfunction in any of the ‘systems’ might be translated to real life situations, as well as specifically talk about sensory integrative dysfunction. Vestibular System: The sensory system that responds to the position of the head in relation to gravity and accelerated or decelerated movement: it integrates neck, eye, and body adjustments to movement.* Tactile: Pertaining to the sense of touch.* Tactile Defensiveness: A sensory integrative dysfunction in which tactile sensations cause negative emotional reactions.* Proprioception: Perception of sensations from the muscles and joints.* Motor Planning (Praxis): The ability of the brain to conceive of, organize and carry out a series of unfamiliar actions.* Apraxia: The lack of motor planning.* Kinesthesia: Perception of the movement of individual body parts; dependent on proprioception.* Gravitational Insecurity: An unusual degree of anxiety or fear in response to movement or change in head position; related to poor processing of vestibular and proprioception information.* Co contraction: The simultaneous contraction of all the muscles around a joint to stabilize it.* Some helpful resources…. Sensory Integration and the Child- A Jean Ayres SI International www.sensoryint.com Nashville Sensory Integration Dysfunction Foundation www.nashvillesid.com A Parent’s Guide to Understanding Sensory Integration * (glossary terms taken from this booklet)